I firmly believe that
test screenings are an important step in releasing a successful film.
I've held test screenings for all of my animated films since “I
Married a Strange Person”.
Since we're close to
finishing CHEATIN', I decided to have a test screening at the
wonderful Nitehawk Cinema in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
We had a terrific
sell-out crowd, plus some of the key creatives were there to help
with the presentation: producer Desirée Stavracos, composer Nicole
Renaud, editor Kevin Palmer and executive producer James Hancock.
As a keepsake, I gave all
the audience members worn down pencils from the production from the
production of the film. So it was very cool that people could write
critical remarks with a pencil that was also used in the film's
creation.
I instructed everyone to
give negative comments that would make the film better. I wanted to
know if anything was confusing or boring, and how I could improve it.
The audience seemed to
enjoy the film, they laughed a number of times, and there was welcome
applause at the end.
After the screening, I
held a short Q&A session to get people's thoughts and ideas for
improvements. Then, after we all retired to the lobby for drinks,
everyone who participated in the test was given a drawing of either
Ella or Jake.
I'm now collating the
results of the questionnaires, and deciding how to improve the story.
It's great when most of the listed problems are similar – thank
goodness there was a clear consensus about what needs to be fixed.
That makes it so much easier to solve these problems quickly.
I think that artists who
don't want feedback on their films really don't care if people like
what they make. Filmmakers have to decide if they're making movies
for themselves or the audience. I'm making the movie so the audience
has a good time – and that's why I believe in test screenings.
What an incredible idea.
ReplyDeleteI guess we all know that big studios test their films in front of a live audience, but I never considered independent animators doing the same.
Glad to hear it was a positive experience for you (and the audience).
Can't wait to see the end result.
--Phil
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFor me, much of the allure of Bill's films has been that what we see on the screen is his vision, and not something decided upon as profitable by a group of corporate suits. It's why his films stand out, but also part of the reason they may not be as popular as they could be. Sometimes some of Bill's vision either doesn't come through his animation, or else is too far out for an audience to understand. This prescreening is a great idea. The audience would generally already be Plympton fans, and so (hopefully) wouldn't want a film that conforms to 90 percent of the "popular" animation out there--but they still could help smooth out some "rough edges" for the film. I'm ready to see it.
ReplyDeleteI actually feel that there is an area of overlap between making a film for an audience and making a film for yourself and, if you can find that sweet spot, you can experience both popular success and satisfaction with your own work.
ReplyDelete